I just saw my new novel in a bookstore for the first time and nearly cried. Oh, all right, I’ll come clean: I did cry. It isn’t every day that your dreams come true, yet last month, with the publication of my novel THE WISHING HILL by NAL/Penguin, mine did.
“I don’t get it,” said a friend. “I mean, it’s great that you’ve published another book, but this isn’t your first. Why is it such a big deal?”
It is a little tough to explain what a huge deal this is for me, but let me try. First, a brief history: I never meant to be a writer. I studied biology in college with the goal of going to medical school. Then, my last semester of college, I signed up for a class in Creative Writing.
Boom! “The scales fell from her eyes,” as Henry James would say. I’d always been a voracious reader, but I’d never known any writers. Now here I was, in a class with a real, honest-to-God novelist. I started writing fiction, put my medical school applications on hold, and never looked back. From that day on, every job I took was in support of my fiction addiction.
I did end up going to graduate school to earn a Master’s in Fine Arts in creative writing, figuring I’d better get my feet wet in literary waters so that I could swim with the best of them. During that time, I attended craft workshops, took literature classes, and wrote a book of short stories and a novel that everyone thought was sure to be published.
It wasn’t. In fact, not one of my next five novels was published. Meanwhile, I achieved success as a nonfiction writer, making my living writing articles and essays, and by ghostwriting celebrity memoirs and health books. In 2009, I even managed to publish a memoir of my own, THE GERBIL FARMER’S DAUGHTER, with Broadway Books, a division of Random House.
That was a great day—I still remember my father-in-law hollering down from the balcony of his Florida condo, saying, “Your agent’s on the phone! You have an offer!” as one of the brightest highlights of my career. The memoir did reasonably well, yet still nobody wanted my novels. The publishing industry was crashing down around our ears circa 2010, with Random House closing down the entire division of Broadway Books soon after I published the memoir.
As self publishing rose from an activity people did in secret, in the dim recesses of their basements, to become an accepted, and even preferred, means of getting one’s books into the hands of readers, I decided I had nothing more to lose. I didn’t want to go to my grave not having published a novel, so I took the novel I loved best—SLEEPING TIGERS, the one my agent had just given up on as he started sending out my newest novel—and self-published it through CreateSpace. I chose the complete publishing package and published the book for under $800, both in paperback-on-demand and as an e-book. Two weeks later, the unthinkable happened: my agent (who has hung in there with me, bless his soul) called to say we had an offer, an actual offer, on my newest novel, THE WISHING HILL, from New American Library, a division of Penguin.
So, in 2012 I was an indie novelist with SLEEPING TIGERS, and in July 2013, I became a traditionally-published novelist with THE WISHING HILL.
Now, for any writers out there wondering whether to go indie or traditional, I want to share my observations as a hybrid author. Here are some of the key differences between the two:
As an indie author, you have complete control. You decide when your book is ready for public consumption, and you decide what sort of indie publisher to take on as your partner. Options now range from complete DIY services like CreateSpace—which I found to be extremely efficient, professional, and cheap—to independent publishers who offer a range of editorial services and will hold your hand through the process. Traditionally-published authors have very little control over the publication timeline and don’t even control things like what goes on your book’s Amazon page.
The timetable for self-publishing a book is fast. From the time I handed my manuscript to CreateSpace to the time the book was published took a total of six weeks. As a traditional author, it took me over a year to see my novel in print, and that’s actually considered speedy. I have many friends whose books have taken two or three years from the time of acceptance to publication day with traditional publishers, and that’s not even factoring in the time it took them to get agents first.
Few self-published writers bother with agents, though that’s starting to change as some bestselling hybrid authors (mostly in romance or fantasy genres) are keeping e-book rights to themselves and just signing deals for paperback rights, as in the case of certain bestselling fantasy and romance authors. If you want a traditional deal, however, you will need an agent first. Most big publishers won’t look at books that haven’t been vetted by a literary agent first.
Indie authors must pay for all editing services. Every writer needs an editor, so don’t kid yourself that you can do this completely on your own. At least hire a copy editor to catch your grammar boo-boos, and if you can swing it, hire a developmental editor as well. This is costly but worth it for your reputation and growth as a writer. The big difference with a traditional publisher is that you will have an editor who is your advocate, champion, and teacher all at once. Your editor will go back and forth with you on your book at least twice, asking for revisions, and then the manuscript will be gone over carefully by a copy editor who fact checks and tightens the grammar. I became a better novelist this past year simply by reworking THE WISHING HILL with the help of my astute editors, and I can definitely tell the difference in quality between this novel and the one I published on my own.
One of the biggest complaints writers lob at big publishing houses is that those publishers not only take control of many of your rights, but also take the lion’s share of royalties. Instead of earning 75 percent of each e-book sold, for instance (as I do on SLEEPING TIGERS), traditionally-published authors might earn as little as 10 or 25 percent. However, the cost of self-publishing your own book can also be, as one of my good friends puts it, “the cost of a small elephant.” If you’re going to self-publish and promote a book, you’d better have a few thousand dollars saved up. Meanwhile, your traditionally-published pals will get advances split into three parts, to be paid on sale, acceptance, and publication of the manuscript. Advances on first books vary widely.
This is, perhaps, the biggest difference between indie and traditionally-published books: how they are marketed. With a traditional publisher like Penguin, I have a publicist and a marketing team. Yes, you can pay for those things as an indie author, but they cost a bundle. In addition, most traditional publishing houses have tremendously efficient machinery and can get your book onto actual bookstore shelves not only here, but internationally as well.
Books are increasingly reviewed online, typically by book bloggers or on sites like Goodreads and Fresh Fiction. However, “big” print and online reviewers like The New York Times, Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, and Booklist still typically only review traditionally-published books, not indie books, unless you’re prepared to pay for those reviews. (And they’re not cheap.)
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Ask yourself these questions to decide whether you should go indie or try for a traditional deal:
If you want complete control over your work; write in a popular genre like fantasy or romance; write quickly; don’t care about having your books in bookstores; and have the deep pockets to pay for your editorial, publication, and marketing expenses, go indie.
However, if you’re more interested in taking time on each book and doing multiple revisions with editors, reaching bookstores and international markets, and don’t have the pockets to finance your own publishing and publicity, I’d say keep knocking on doors and trying for an agent and a traditional deal.
I’m really glad that I self-published a novel. I found the indie community to be warm and welcoming, and the process of getting a book to publication and then trying to market it myself was hugely instructive. However, I have now signed a contract to have my next novel, BEACH PLUM ISLAND, published by New American Library/Penguin as well, primarily because I adore my editor and feel like I have so much more to learn from her.
Plus, seeing my book in an actual bookstore is a thrill unlike any other, and I can’t wait to experience it again.
Joanne Tailele says
Great post Holly. The two avenues are really like apples and oranges, aren’t they? You can’t say one is better, than the other – just different. I was also glad to Indie publish my debut novel, but hope to find an agent for the next one. If I could just learn patience and perseverance, neither quality that I excel in.
Yes, it’s true that we all need to learn to be patient through the process, and that’s definitely one of the toughest lessons for any writer who is enthusiastic about finding readers NOW! Remind yourself that you’ve shown great persistence just by finishing a novel in the first place–many people don’t even make it that far. Congratulate yourself!
Sarah LaFleur says
Thanks so much for this great article! I’m grappling with this very issue as I query for agents with my finished novel and write the second one. It’s nice to know you can experience the best of both worlds. Congrats!
Oh, good luck, Sarah! What an exciting time for you. I can’t wait to hear how it all goes! Keep me posted.
Andrew McAllister says
Thanks Holly. I really enjoyed your post. Great food for thought! I am nearing completion on a non-fiction book that I think has the potential to attract an agent, so I’ve been wrestling with exactly that question. The option I’m considering is to self-publish first, and hopefully have some success that I can leverage to attract an agent and publisher. Do you have any thoughts on that approach?
Thanks for reading & weighing in, Andrew! While it’s true that some authors do attract agents and editors on the basis of self-published books if those books sell well, it is also true that I have several friends whose books have done well, but who traditional publishers haven’t wanted to take on because they feel like the books have already reached the readership they were meant to reach–you might have to self publish this book you’re working on now, build a platform, and then look for a traditional publisher on the basis of that platform. If you think your book has the potential to attract an agent and publisher, why not try that first? I think then you could self publish knowing you fully explored that option if no publisher takes it; just give yourself a reasonable deadline of a year or so to see if you can attract and agent and a deal. (Yep, I know that seems long.)
Jo Carroll says
Thank you – this is a really balanced assessment of the pros and cons and avoids flag-waving for either side.
Thanks for stopping by, Jo. I’m glad you found it useful!
Caleb Pirtle says
This is a great blog, Holly. I would love to re-publish it on Venture Galleries. If you have no objection, please send me a Word document to firstname.lastname@example.org
Of course, Caleb. I’d be honored!
Lindsay Leggett says
This is a great post, especially seen from both sides of the table.
I decided to go Indie when I realized the small press I’d signed with couldn’t get the distribution I could on my own (sad, but true). It’s been a wild ride, and one I wouldn’t change for the world. The remainder of this series will be Indie, and a few of my surrealist and horror works in the future.
But the rest will go traditional. Sometimes it’s just about the book. My YA contemporary will do better with a House, as will my YA horror. My surreal writing probably won’t get a second look, but will probably get a few reads (one hopes!)
I still get asked whether my next book will go trad or Indie, but I really think that there are pros to both sides, and that the individual title will ultimately decide.
Major congrats on your book! That’s so exciting! 🙂
Thanks, Lindsay, and congratulations to you as well! I think you’re right on the mark here when you say “it really depends on the book.” I think genre does play a major role in whether you can reach more readers going indie or traditional. I appreciate you taking the time to read the post & offer your insights.
Ali Hubbard says
Great information. One other consideration for me is my day job, which I really love (seriously!). If I worked with a traditional publisher, then I would also want to give them 110%. So from a life balance perspective, self-publishing seems like it would give me the flexibility to justice to both. But I’m still mulling it all over and appreciate information like you shared!!!!
Thank you, Ali, and good luck. Let me know how it goes for you!
Kevin Brennan says
This was inspiring. And I know the feeling you’re talking about — there’s your book on bookstore shelves, or even better, in the window! But I detected a possibly unintentional implication here that an author has a real choice, when the truth is that it’s incredibly hard to get an agent these days, and, depending on the genre you write in, almost as hard for the agent to get a deal for you. I wish it were as simple as “indie vs traditional,” but for the majority of writers the path is more like “indie and hoping for traditional one day.”
Well, you’re right, of course, in the sense that many writers (me, included) get frustrated trying so hard and never getting anywhere. On the other hand, many writers today just self publish without even considering traditional publishing because they don’t want to wait, when perhaps they might be better off waiting and taking the time to work with an agent and traditional editor & house. I’m just encouraging people not to give up too easily, and to really consider their options carefully. Thanks for weighing in!